*TRIGGER WARNING* in case it wasn't painfully obvious for this thread by
now.
On 14/03/14 02:21, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote:
Gunnar Wolf gw...@gwolf.org writes:
Jo Shields dijo [Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:34:59PM +]:
Let's be very, very, very clear then.
This is a game where you play
I honestly believe that almost none of those of us discusing the game
has even tried it (I haven't at least) and I don't think anyone who
hasn't even tested it can have a solid opinion. As far as I
understand, we're all defining our position 2nd hand on Bas' analysis.
Let's be very, very,
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 21:41 -0400,
saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote:
Quoting Jo Shields direct...@apebox.org:
Why am I only hearing about licensing concerns regarding a package I
maintain when reading about it on a personal attack website? I'd usually
think that a package's
constituent
licenses, by accident? See also: Hanlon's Razor.
Regards.
--Jo Shields
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 21:05 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Hi Jo,
Nice to see your newly found interest in C++ packages (though, not
completely unexpected) :-)
Nothing wrong with C++ in moderation. My last ITP was a C++ browser
plugin.
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:26:18PM +0100, Jo Shields
5 matches
Mail list logo
