Re: Comments regarding tegaki-zinnia-japanese_0.1-1_amd64.changes

; to ask the opinion of more people. > debian-legal@lists.debian.org -- Best Regards LI Daobing -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Bug#522311: qbittorrent: Linked with OpenSSL, seems to be a GPL violation

t; exception even if they don't directly use the OpenSSL library. > This could be a problem, eventually. > yes, it is really needed, if you want to run OpenSSL and GPL code in the same process. -- Best Regards LI Daobing -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Bug#522311: qbittorrent: Linked with OpenSSL, seems to be a GPL violation

On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 17:43, Cristian Greco wrote: > On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 12:00:56PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 05:06, Cristian Greco >> wrote: >> > [ CCing debian-legal for comments ] >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 1

Re: Bug#522311: qbittorrent: Linked with OpenSSL, seems to be a GPL violation

ecutable linking is caused by libtorrent-rasterbar (BSD > code linked against libssl) or some other required libraries/headers. In the > former case, if linking is caused by the torrent library, all of its clients > should add such exception. > > My thought is that qbittorrent shouldn't be affected by this problem because > it > doesn't really link against libssl. And BTW, the source code includes licenses > such as LGPL, BSD and MIT, so it shouldn't need the exception anyway. > I think it need an exception. GPL licensed code and OpenSSL licensed code should not run in the same process. -- Best Regards LI Daobing -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Doxygen Documentation from LGPL source under CC-BY-SA-2.5

. Would this still be allowed if the documentation is > generated from LGPL source files? > I think you can regenerate it again, so it can be under LGPL license -- Best Regards, LI Daobing -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

please help check fqterm's license

em fulfill the license (GPL with openssl exception), am I corret? Thanks. -- Best Regards, LI Daobing -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

license issuse in qterm

clearly marked as such, and if the derived work is * incompatible with the protocol description in the RFC file, it must be * called by a name other than "ssh" or "Secure Shell". */ -- Best Regards, LI Daobing -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject