Re: hydra not dfsg-free?

d ask upstream to clarify the license. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/04/msg00136.html [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=258057 [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/04/msg00139.html -- Niklas Vainio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Bug#248782: abuse-sfx: violation of license terms

ml It seems they only released the source code into public domain, not data. > It sounds like perhaps the maintainer of the package should email > Jonathan Clark and get a clarification? abuse-sfx has been orphaned so there is no maintainer to do that. So I will do it. - Nikke -- N

Re: CA certificates

about original works with some creativity in them. Computer-generated, seemingly random string of numbers hardly is such a work. - Nikke -- Niklas Vainio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: xzx license

ackages have a link to their license text in the package page. Here's the text: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/x/xzx/xzx_3.0.1-2/copyright - Nikke -- Niklas Vainio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

xzx license

debian-legal, xzx's license forbids modification but we have a diff of over 30 kB. It looks like it's undistributable in the current form. See bug 240941. Please comment. Thanks, - Nikke -- Niklas Vainio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Non-free package licenses and replacements

placements and comments on whether some packages should be either moved to main or removed completely because of the license or what kind of changes to the license we could suggest to upstream. The page is at http://www.iki.fi/nvainio/debian/non-free.html - Nikke -- Niklas Vainio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>