Re: GPL versions mismatch.

Anthony W. Youngman wrote: In message he7933$tg...@ger.gmane.org, Raúl Sánchez Siles rasas...@gmail.com writes From what you've said, I think the way forward is apparent. As you surmise, accepting GPL v3 contributions isn't possible with the current project status saying the project licence

Re: GPL versions mismatch.

Anthony W. Youngman wrote: In message he2uoo$om...@ger.gmane.org, Raúl Sánchez Siles rasas...@gmail.com writes The other thing is (I don't know OpenSSL) is that the GPL is incompatible with OpenSSL (which is likely) or is OpenSSL incompatible with the GPL? If it's the GPL which won't let

Re: GPL versions mismatch.

Anthony W. Youngman wrote: In message 200911172213.59167.rasas...@gmail.com, Raúl Sánchez Siles rasas...@gmail.com writes Hello: [...] This is how licences are currently arranged in KVIrc: · Project license: GPLv2 adding openssl exception. · Source files in project: almost all GPLv2

GPL versions mismatch.

not sure how this move would affect in this case. What do you think about this situation? what do you think would be the best or simplest solution? Thanks a lot, -- Raúl Sánchez Siles -Proud Debian user- Linux registered user #416098 signature.asc Description

OpenSSL and GPLed kvirc

stable is 3.4.0 Note: Please CC me. -- Raúl Sánchez Siles -Proud Debian user- Linux registered user #416098 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

backporting licence information for koffice hyphenation

/hyphdicts -- Raúl Sánchez Siles -Proud Debian user- Linux registered user #416098 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.