Re: GPL and command-line libraries

2004-11-27 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
in a special form In this reply I try to use exactly those phrases and never 'code' alone. On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:42:27PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I am concerned about is the following scenario: Mr. John Wontshare writes a streaming

GPL and command-line libraries

2004-11-02 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
the intention and degree of dependency be considered in determining if the client was a derivative work or not? What can I do to prevent the above scenario from happening? Thank you very much for your time! -- Wesley W. Terpstra

Re: GPL and command-line libraries

2004-11-02 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
don't share to freeload off my work. I personally hate any kind of algorithm patent, so I wouldn't opt for that solution. I just included it as an option for completeness. -- Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GPL and command-line libraries

2004-11-02 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
ships with one of them, his intention seems to be clear. I don't see how that is logically inconsistent. -- Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GPL and command-line libraries

2004-11-02 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
. The difference between first and second degree murder is one of intention. Though that's a bit dramatic, I think the same sort of thing applies here. -- Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl?

2004-10-20 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
conclusion too. Thanks again! -- Wesley W. Terpstra

Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl?

2004-10-19 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
why. Now I can explain it better. The proposal of keeping one version in main and one in contrib also addresses my concern about usability. So, I am happy with the outcome of this discussion already. =) -- Wesley W. Terpstra

Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl?

2004-10-18 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
the algorithm will the code be released under the GPL. -- Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl?

2004-10-18 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
can only have a copy after I publish. ;) Thank you for your detailed explanation and answer. -- Wesley W. Terpstra

Re: Cheops-ng: DFSG free or non-free?

2004-01-23 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 11:27:20AM -0500, Joe Moore wrote: Wesley W. Terpstra said: So, what does that mean for a package where the copyright holder distributes the package with an extra clause and GPL? Can I redistribute it at all? PS. Please CC me on replies as I am not subscribed

Re: OpenSSL and GPLed programs

2001-06-18 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
: This program is released under the GPL with the additional exemption that compiling, linking, and/or using OpenSSL is allowed. is sufficient? (http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#LEGAL2) Thanks a bundle, btw! -- Wesley W. Terpstra - Linux Developer

Re: OpenSSL and GPLed programs

2001-06-16 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
libraries to be LGPL and tools to be GPL but one of our most basic libraries links to OpenSSL. Is there any way to work problem forcing our libraries to be non-LGPL? Thanks. -- Wesley W. Terpstra - Linux Developer

Re: Integrity of Source Code

2000-11-30 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
/c that's where the user will see the message. If it's a daemon/console app, it has to dump to stdout? PS. This is not a popup we're talking about, but a splash screen - no annoying buttons to press. -- Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] Javien Canada Inc. - Linux Developer pgp3GBmUzTIv3.pgp

Integrity of Source Code

2000-11-29 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
. -- Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] Javien Canada Inc. - Linux Developer pgpwbSeBNyCYO.pgp Description: PGP signature