in a special form
In this reply I try to use exactly those phrases and never 'code' alone.
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:42:27PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I am concerned about is the following scenario:
Mr. John Wontshare writes a streaming
the intention and degree of dependency be
considered in determining if the client was a derivative work or not?
What can I do to prevent the above scenario from happening?
Thank you very much for your time!
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
don't share to freeload off my work.
I personally hate any kind of algorithm patent, so I wouldn't opt for
that solution. I just included it as an option for completeness.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ships with one of them, his intention seems to be clear.
I don't see how that is logically inconsistent.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. The difference between first and second degree murder is
one of intention. Though that's a bit dramatic, I think the same sort of
thing applies here.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
conclusion too.
Thanks again!
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
why. Now I can explain
it better. The proposal of keeping one version in main and one in contrib
also addresses my concern about usability.
So, I am happy with the outcome of this discussion already. =)
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
the algorithm will the
code be released under the GPL.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can only have a copy after I publish. ;)
Thank you for your detailed explanation and answer.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 11:27:20AM -0500, Joe Moore wrote:
Wesley W. Terpstra said:
So, what does that mean for a package where the copyright holder
distributes the package with an extra clause and GPL? Can I
redistribute it at all?
PS. Please CC me on replies as I am not subscribed
:
This program is released under the GPL with the additional exemption that
compiling, linking, and/or using OpenSSL is allowed. is sufficient?
(http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#LEGAL2)
Thanks a bundle, btw!
--
Wesley W. Terpstra - Linux Developer
libraries to be LGPL and tools to be GPL but one of our most
basic libraries links to OpenSSL. Is there any way to work problem forcing
our libraries to be non-LGPL?
Thanks.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra - Linux Developer
/c that's where
the user will see the message. If it's a daemon/console app, it has to dump
to stdout?
PS. This is not a popup we're talking about, but a splash screen - no
annoying buttons to press.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Javien Canada Inc. - Linux Developer
pgp3GBmUzTIv3.pgp
.
--
Wesley W. Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Javien Canada Inc. - Linux Developer
pgpwbSeBNyCYO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
14 matches
Mail list logo