On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 17:50:12 +0200, Jocobo Tarrio wrote:
IOW, nowhere in the DFSG says something like you cannot restrict the
user's right to have their modified copies of the software called in the
same way as the original. In fact, there's one place (DFSG #4) where it
says just the
On 2004-01-31 14:01:42 + MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2004-01-30 19:31:44 + paul cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If XFree86 does not consider linking to create a derived work which
must carry the same restrictions as those in the library, then it
does not seem
-200401.diff.gz
[4] http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses
[5] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#OrigBSD
[6] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LinkingWithGPL
--
paul cannon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
--
..
| paul cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| IWIWAL http://people.debian.org/~pik/ |
?
--
..
| paul cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| FFAL (far from a lawyer)http://people.debian.org/~pik/ |
? Considering the
battles raging even today to take away or undermine free software, I
don't consider that a wise plan.
--
..
| paul cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| http
with an X the following item only if it is true.
[ X ] I am a Debian Developer as described in the Debian
Constitution as of the date on this survey.
=== CUT HERE ===
--
..
| paul cannon
7 matches
Mail list logo