Could you open a lintian bug with:
- md5sum
- sha1
- sha256
of the previous file.
I will add to not distributable list of file
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 20-04-14 17:57, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
>> Please find below a discussion about a licence issue found during re
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 23.08.2013, 16:32 -0300 schrieb Rogério Brito:
>> Anyway, back to URW Garamond No. 8, I guess that the letter that I
>> wrote may still be relevant. Should I try sending it?
>
> Yes, please do so! Maybe we have some chance
Any news ?
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> Le samedi 13 avril 2013 16:50:38, roucaries bastien a écrit :
>> Ok get it it seems
>> http://visualiseur.bnf.fr/Visualiseur?Destination=Daguerre&O=8013775&E=JPEG
>> &NavigationSimplif
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
wrote:
> Hi everyone! I have a question about the license status of a package I
> maintain, docsis.
>
> Docsis uses libsnmp. In turn, since the last upload, libsnmp added -lcrypto,
> making it link against libopenssl.
>
> Docsis is unde
Ok get it it seems
http://visualiseur.bnf.fr/Visualiseur?Destination=Daguerre&O=8013775&E=JPEG&NavigationSimplifiee=ok&typeFonds=noir
Ask to the BNF desk the acquision history.
Bastien
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 4:47 PM, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> Or here
> http://image
Or here
http://images.bnf.fr/jsp/index.jsp
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 4:43 PM, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> Ok go here for research
>
> http://www.bnf.fr/fr/collections_et_services/anx_dep/a.estampes_photographie_classement.html
>
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 4:41 PM, roucaries bastien
Ok go here for research
http://www.bnf.fr/fr/collections_et_services/anx_dep/a.estampes_photographie_classement.html
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 4:41 PM, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Goffi wrote:
>> Le 06/04/2013 23:45, John Vandenberg a écrit :
>
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Goffi wrote:
> Le 06/04/2013 23:45, John Vandenberg a écrit :
>>
>> [SNIP]
>>
>>
>> Do the copyright check yourself. Do you know of an online resource that
>> shows a Piatnik deck with a rough publishing date, so they can be used for
>> comparison?
>>
>> You might
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 09:51 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:25:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:03:52PM +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
>>>
I'm maintaining a package that conta
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Michael Wild
wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I'm maintaining a package that contains an EPS image created with Adobe
> Illustrator and hence contains postscript library code that is
> copyrighted by Adobe, e.g.:
>
> * Copyright(C)2000-2006 Adobe Systems, Inc. All Rights Rese
Hi,
I whish to inquire about license of a package triple licensied under
GPL/LGPL/MPL
I have found that libnss3 have some file under BSD4 and could not be
to my own opinion be compatible with GPL*
Do you agree with this analysis ?
Bastien
*see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Ulrik Sverdrup wrote:
> Can GPLv3+ applications written in Python exist in Debian main? The
> applications in question do not use an openssl exception.
>
> Python uses OpenSSL so the moment the application starts, it is linking
> against it too:
>
> $ objdump -p /us
On 8/13/05, Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 01:42:31AM +, roucaries bastien wrote:
> > If you want to use the previous exeption put also in human readable
> > form the following credit in your file before the licence: ''This
I create a subroutine used in type1 font. Do you think that with
licence is suitable.
In want:
o free copy even in commercial font
o free modification even in commercial closed font
o I don't want final users of thefont, the document writers, put a
credit line in thier document :-). Even in pdf tha
First please CC me as I'm not a member of the list.
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> If there is no other sensible way to write the function then it's not
> copyrightable. But be pretty damned sure of that before taking
> advantage of it.
Fortunatly, I can rewrite the program and it look like a little bi
i want to package metatype1 for debian
this program use postscript program that is really short and
copyrighted by adobe.
The problem it's that if I rewrite this 3 lines they will always look
like the original
See for more information
http://groups.google.fr/group/comp.lang.postscript/browse_frm/
16 matches
Mail list logo
