Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately, that is not the case. All of the source for packages
> in main must satisfy the DFSG. For example, if there are some
> non-free, but distributable, files in the original tar ball, those
> have to be taken out and a new "original" tar ball
"Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Do we have to split the alsa-tools source into two packages, one free
> >and one non-free/contrib? It will make it a bit harder.
> No.
Unfortunately, that is not the case. All of the source for packages
in main must satis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Do we have to split the alsa-tools source into two packages, one free
>and one non-free/contrib? It will make it a bit harder.
No.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan Chen wrote:
--- Mikael Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I have debianized alsa-tools and am looking for a
sponsor.
What is the status of alsa-tools being in Debian
legally? Rather, what is debian-legal's stance on
these packages? Since the firmware has been separated
out into upstream's als
4 matches
Mail list logo