Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] RFS: alsa-tools

2005-02-01 Thread Matthew Garrett
Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately, that is not the case. All of the source for packages > in main must satisfy the DFSG. For example, if there are some > non-free, but distributable, files in the original tar ball, those > have to be taken out and a new "original" tar ball

Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] RFS: alsa-tools

2005-01-31 Thread Walter Landry
"Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Do we have to split the alsa-tools source into two packages, one free > >and one non-free/contrib? It will make it a bit harder. > No. Unfortunately, that is not the case. All of the source for packages in main must satis

Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] RFS: alsa-tools

2005-01-29 Thread Marco d'Itri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Do we have to split the alsa-tools source into two packages, one free >and one non-free/contrib? It will make it a bit harder. No. -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] RFS: alsa-tools

2005-01-26 Thread Mikael Magnusson
Dan Chen wrote: --- Mikael Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have debianized alsa-tools and am looking for a sponsor. What is the status of alsa-tools being in Debian legally? Rather, what is debian-legal's stance on these packages? Since the firmware has been separated out into upstream's als