Re: [Q] copyright on binary packages

2004-10-13 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen
Apologies for not following up to the messages on the list. I'll cut and paste your replies into my original message. I hope I didn't put anyone's quote in the wrong context. Brian Thomas Sniffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Brian Thomas Sniffen <[

Re: [Q] copyright on binary packages

2004-10-12 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-10-12 10:40:38 +0100 Olaf Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've been "pestered" by the people who pay for the development of several of our packages to add a blurb claiming copyright on the *binary* packages we build and distribute. What do you mean "blurb"? Including a debian/cop

[Q] copyright on binary packages

2004-10-12 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen
NOTE: The packages I am talking about are not debianised (yet) and contain non-free code. If that disqualifies me from asking that's too bad but this is as good a place to ask as I could find. I've been "pestered" by the people who pay for the development of several of our packages to add a blurb