On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 01:04:19PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
Not all jurisdictions recognize the ability of authors to put their
works into the public domain.
I don't believe this to be accurate.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 01:04:19PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
Not all jurisdictions recognize the ability of authors to put their
works into the public domain.
I don't believe this to be accurate.
Accurate or not, I doubt the author would
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 10:18:40AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Accurate or not, I doubt the author would sue anyone in one of those
places for using the code.
That doesn't matter. His heirs may.
--
Glenn Maynard
Hi all,
I have found a software package I'd like to make into a proper Debian
package. Now the problem is a kind of mixed license.
The package is Gnosis-Utils:
http://freshmeat.net/projects/gnosisxml/?topic_id=912%2C868
And the license can be found here:
Not all jurisdictions recognize the ability of authors to put their
works into the public domain. Perhaps you could get him to release
the code under a very permissive license, such as the MIT/X11 license?
If that's not acceptable, a public-domain declaration is, I think,
good enough for Debian
Brian Thomas Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not all jurisdictions recognize the ability of authors to put their
works into the public domain. Perhaps you could get him to release
the code under a very permissive license, such as the MIT/X11 license?
Having just read the license -- much
On Feb 5, 2004, at 12:44, Magnus Therning wrote:
And the license can be found here:
http://www.gnosis.cx/download/gnosis/doc/LICENSE
Despite silly things like and in fact do anything you could do with
content of your own creation, I think it's fine to put the
public-domain stuff in main.
7 matches
Mail list logo
