On Feb 24, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know, no need to teach me. But what are you trying to say? Or are you
That your change is a deliberate DMCA violation (circumvention of
technological measures).
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 2/25/06, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 24, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know, no need to teach me. But what are you trying to say? Or are you
That your change is a deliberate DMCA violation (circumvention of
technological measures).
#include hallo.h
* Kel Modderman [Fri, Feb 24 2006, 11:05:37PM]:
Package: sl-modem-source
Version: 2.9.9d+e-pre2-2
|Severity: grave
+sl-modem (2.9.9d+e-pre2-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * New upstream pre-release (closes: #327588)
+ * added sv.po from Daniel Nylander (closes: #330436)
HACK_MODULE_INFO(LICENSE, GPL, The licensing of this module is *NOT* \
GPL-Nazis' business. Oh and BTW, the GPL it is not... notwithstanding \
the presence of the string of data consisting of the letters 'G-P-L'. \
Inquiring Minds: see Sega v. Accolade and Lexmark v. Static Control.);
regards,
Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Kel Modderman [Fri, Feb 24 2006, 11:05:37PM]:
Package: sl-modem-source
Version: 2.9.9d+e-pre2-2
|Severity: grave
+sl-modem (2.9.9d+e-pre2-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * New upstream pre-release (closes: #327588)
+ * added sv.po from Daniel Nylander
Kel Modderman writes:
Can you please clarify at all? What makes a license clone an
interchangeable license, especially since you are the one responsible
for the actual license change, and not Smart Link Ltd.? What do they
think about it? Is it your lawful right to change it? Please write a
6 matches
Mail list logo
