Le ven 29/08/2003 à 22:01, Mathieu Roy a écrit :
The DFSG is free enough to be useful -- you still cannot just simply
modify it and redistribute it under the same name, do you?
So what?
The LPPL has the same restriction and is considered free by Debian, GNU
and OSI.
--
.''`.
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 04:53:09PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Yes, and our goal is to always respect authors: by not distributing
works that they don't wish to make available under the terms of the
DFSG.
Including the GPL and the DFSG?
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:01:40PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
The DFSG is free enough to be useful -- you still cannot just simply
modify it and redistribute it under the same name, do you? Or is that
exactly what mean build on? Am I able to publish a DFSG named DFSG
(if it's just because
On 2003-08-29 21:01:40 +0100 Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May I for instance take a copy of Debian and redistribute it by
_only_
changing the DFSG text, adding a line saying that the GFDL qualified
documentation as free documentation?
Probably (modulo any trademark guff), but if you
4 matches
Mail list logo
