Re: Concluding the debate (was Re: Towards a new LPPL draft)

2002-07-23 Thread Jeremy Hankins
Jeff Licquia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - The requirement for modifications to LaTeX to be in files with different names from the original files, when combined with the ability for LaTeX to do filename mapping for file references, does not constitute a violation of the Debian Free

Concluding the debate (was Re: Towards a new LPPL draft)

2002-07-22 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 14:31, Frank Mittelbach wrote: it seems to me that by now we are turning around in cycles rehashing arguments that are important in general (can LaTeX have security problems, yes or no?; how does one do software development ...) but not with respect to the problem at hand

Re: Concluding the debate (was Re: Towards a new LPPL draft)

2002-07-22 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 04:04:25PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: - The requirement for modifications to LaTeX to be in files with different names from the original files, when combined with the ability for LaTeX to do filename mapping for file references, does not constitute a violation of