-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've seen a previous review from debian legal about the Creative Commons
licences which renders them non free. However, I've just come across a licence
claiming to be Creative Commons Deed Attribution 2.5 which is considerably
shorter and afaict is
This one time, at band camp, Matthew Johnson said:
I've seen a previous review from debian legal about the Creative Commons
licences which renders them non free. However, I've just come across a licence
claiming to be Creative Commons Deed Attribution 2.5 which is considerably
shorter and
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
All data files, except the songs and the font files mentioned above,
are licensed under the following license:
Creative Commons Deed Attribution 2.5
That looks fine.
cool
Matthew Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've seen a previous review from debian legal about the Creative Commons
licences which renders them non free. However, I've just come across a
licence
claiming to be
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:14:27 -0500 Joe Smith wrote:
[...]
Well that is just the non-legalese synopsis of the CC-by-2.5.
It seems so.
It was not intended to be used as an actual licence text.
Definitely *not* intended.
It certainly can be used as a licence text. (Just about anything can
5 matches
Mail list logo