On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:11:28AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andreas Bombe writes ("Freeness of vague Synopsys license"):
> > Keeping these files would be "nice to have" but not a requirement. Users
> > with legacy VHDL projects using Synopsys libraries would
Andreas Bombe writes ("Freeness of vague Synopsys license"):
> I am currently working on reintroducing GHDL into Debian. It is a VHDL
> compiler/simulator that includes non-standard VHDL libraries from
> various vendors and I have to throw out most of them (unlike before, it
&
Andreas Bombe writes:
> I'm now unsure whether I should keep the Synopsys libraries which
> found some wider use before its features were finally offered by the
> VHDL language standard.
>
> Here is the copyright statement and license from one of the files in
> its entirety:
Thank you for naming
I am currently working on reintroducing GHDL into Debian. It is a VHDL
compiler/simulator that includes non-standard VHDL libraries from
various vendors and I have to throw out most of them (unlike before, it
now comes with the core standard libraries reimplemented under a free
license). I'm now un
4 matches
Mail list logo
