Re: GFDL (Was Re: documentation eq software ?)

2003-08-30 Thread Mathieu Roy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian T. Sniffen) a tapoté : The very text of the GFDL which you quote gives permission for translations as the *only* kind of derivative work possible for Invariant Sections: in particular, annotations are not permitted. Either way, we've gotten way off on a tangent.

GFDL (Was Re: documentation eq software ?)

2003-08-29 Thread Brian T. Sniffen
The very text of the GFDL which you quote gives permission for translations as the *only* kind of derivative work possible for Invariant Sections: in particular, annotations are not permitted. Either way, we've gotten way off on a tangent. The GFDL does not meet the DFSG. I present two pieces