Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:07:40 -0500 Joe Smith wrote:
[...]
Well it is no less free than the MPL.
IMO, the MPL does *not* meet the DFSG.
That is exactly why I phrased it as no less free than.
Nothing was added that
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:07:40 -0500 Joe Smith wrote:
[...]
Well it is no less free than the MPL.
IMO, the MPL does *not* meet the DFSG.
Some other debian-legal contributors share this opinion:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/06/msg00221.html
Hello there,
I'd like to package piece of software for Debian called VISL CG
(Constraint Grammar).
The licence file (see Appendix A.) is a bit strange, and although it
states it is derived from the MPL, I'd like to get an opinion as to if
it is a free-software licence or not (as defined by the
Francis Tyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello there,
I'd like to package piece of software for Debian called VISL CG
(Constraint Grammar).
The licence file (see Appendix A.) is a bit strange, and although it
states it is derived from the MPL, I'd like to get
On Sun, 2008-03-02 at 22:07 -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
Francis Tyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello there,
I'd like to package piece of software for Debian called VISL CG
(Constraint Grammar).
The licence file (see Appendix A.) is a bit strange, and
5 matches
Mail list logo