-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Walter Landry wrote:
Giancarlo Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am working now at this. However, I have a notice in every file
stating that the file is released under the terms described in the
LICENSE file that must come bound with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Walter Landry wrote:
Giancarlo Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Walter Landry wrote:
Giancarlo Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In example, I can release Falcon as a Debian package under
GPL, and let users pick FPLL if they wish.
That would be
Giancarlo Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am working now at this. However, I have a notice in every file
stating that the file is released under the terms described in the
LICENSE file that must come bound with the sources. I think that
changing the content of that file, instead of
Sean Kellogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:10:07 pm Francesco Poli wrote:
I don't think that copyright laws give you the right to control
distribution of Scripts, that is to say, works written in your
programming language.
[...]
There's even the question of how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Walter Landry wrote:
Giancarlo Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In example, I can release Falcon as a Debian package under GPL, and
let users pick FPLL if they wish.
That would be perfect. Many other programs in Debian are
dual-licensed in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MJ Ray wrote:
Sean Kellogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:10:07 pm Francesco Poli wrote:
I don't think that copyright laws give you the right to control
distribution of Scripts, that is to say, works written in
your
Giancarlo Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Walter Landry wrote:
Giancarlo Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In example, I can release Falcon as a Debian package under GPL, and
let users pick FPLL if they wish.
That would be perfect. Many other programs in Debian are
dual-licensed in
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:35:16 +0100 (CET) Giancarlo Niccolai wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
Frankly speaking, I cannot understand what you are trying to achieve.
You are trying to create a license which is more restrictive than the
Apache License v2.0, and you are calling those extra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francesco Poli wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:35:16 +0100 (CET) Giancarlo Niccolai wrote:
| Embedding Works shall mean any work, whether in Source | or
Object form, that links (or binds by name) to the | interface of
the Work and Derivative
Francesco Poli wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:59:33 +0100 Giancarlo Niccolai wrote:
I assume you mean that you would like to have your license analyzed or
revised by debian-legal.
Yes, sorry, the word was eaten while editing :-/
The license is tightly based on Apache 2, with extra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
As suggested by Mr. Paul Wise, I am writing here to have the Falcon
Programming Language License by Debian.
The license is tightly based on Apache 2, with extra clarifications
and permissions. Rationale behind this license is that of provide
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:59:33 +0100 Giancarlo Niccolai wrote:
Hello,
Hi!
As suggested by Mr. Paul Wise, I am writing here to have the Falcon
Programming Language License by Debian.
I assume you mean that you would like to have your license analyzed
or revised by debian-legal.
The
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:10:07 pm Francesco Poli wrote:
I don't think that copyright laws give you the right to control
distribution of Scripts, that is to say, works written in your
programming language.
For instance, I don't think I need permission from anyone in order to
write
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:00:31 -0700 Sean Kellogg wrote:
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:10:07 pm Francesco Poli wrote:
I don't think that copyright laws give you the right to control
distribution of Scripts, that is to say, works written in your
programming language.
For instance, I don't
14 matches
Mail list logo
