+0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:01:51 -0400 Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Is this OK to get httperf back into main?
Assuming that
* httperf is currently released under the GNU GPL v2
It is.
* the only issue that bans httperf from main is its
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 07:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Martin Arlitt wrote:
Roberto
here is the revised exception. please let me know if this is
acceptable.
In addition, as a special exception, the copyright holders give
permission to link the code of this work with the OpenSSL project's
OpenSSL
.
-Roberto
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
[Please CC me, I am not on -legal]
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 01:10:07AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:01:51 -0400 Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Is this OK to get httperf back into main?
Assuming
Is this OK to get httperf back into main?
-Roberto
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 07:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Martin Arlitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Martin Arlitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: forwarded message from Roberto C. Sanchez
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:01:51 -0400 Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Is this OK to get httperf back into main?
Assuming that
* httperf is currently released under the GNU GPL v2
* the only issue that bans httperf from main is its linking against
OpenSSL
* every copyright holder has agreed
[Please CC me, I am not on -legal]
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 01:10:07AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:01:51 -0400 Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Is this OK to get httperf back into main?
Assuming that
* httperf is currently released under the GNU GPL v2
C. Sanchez wrote:
[Please CC me, I am not on -legal]
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 01:10:07AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:01:51 -0400 Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Is this OK to get httperf back into main?
Assuming that
* httperf is currently released under the GNU
7 matches
Mail list logo