On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 19:35, Frank Mittelbach wrote:
David Turner writes:
I've read most of the archives, but couldn't find any comments on what I
think is the biggest misfeature of the LPPL3. Keep in mind that I'm not
speaking for the FSF here, just for me. The FSF hasn't made any
David Turner writes:
OK, how about the following:
As a special exception to the section titled CONDITIONS ON DISTRIBUTION
AND MODIFICATION (Section 57), you may modify the Program by
processing them with automated translation and compilation tools
(Tools) to generate derivative works
I've read most of the archives, but couldn't find any comments on what I
think is the biggest misfeature of the LPPL3. Keep in mind that I'm not
speaking for the FSF here, just for me. The FSF hasn't made any
decisions yet.
Added in LPPL3:
{+If The Program is distributed in a packed form with a
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 19:29, David Turner wrote:
I've read most of the archives, but couldn't find any comments on what I
think is the biggest misfeature of the LPPL3. Keep in mind that I'm not
speaking for the FSF here, just for me. The FSF hasn't made any
decisions yet.
Added in LPPL3:
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 18:35, Jeff Licquia wrote:
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 19:29, David Turner wrote:
I've read most of the archives, but couldn't find any comments on what I
think is the biggest misfeature of the LPPL3. Keep in mind that I'm not
speaking for the FSF here, just for me. The
Hi David!
You wrote:
Plus, you're talking about other files that are most definitely part of
LaTeX that are generated here. It would be different if it required
that gcc be installed in /usr/bin, for example.
No, I'm making a suggestion that, if a file is distributed under the
LPPL,
David Turner writes:
I've read most of the archives, but couldn't find any comments on what I
think is the biggest misfeature of the LPPL3. Keep in mind that I'm not
speaking for the FSF here, just for me. The FSF hasn't made any
decisions yet.
hmmm, perhaps not, but Richard Stallman
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 07:52:15PM -0500, David Turner wrote:
[LPPL3]
If The Program is distributed in a packed form with a number of files
to be generated by some unpacking method from the distributed files,
then these derived files are logically (even if not physically
present) part of
Scripsit Frank Mittelbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Added in LPPL3:
{+If The Program is distributed in a packed form with a number of files
to be generated by some unpacking method from the distributed files,
then these derived files are logically (even if not physically
present) part of
9 matches
Mail list logo
