Re: Legal issues with haskell-unix-time

2016-05-26 Thread vheuser
ts.debian.org> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 3:19 AM Subject: Re: Legal issues with haskell-unix-time El 24/05/16 a les 12:36, Dmitry Bogatov ha escrit: There is 'cbits/conv.c' in 'haskell-unix-time' source package, which is probably is of same copyright, as haskell code (BSD-3-clau

Re: Legal issues with haskell-unix-time

2016-05-26 Thread Ben Finney
Eloi writes: > Just a side question: Are these funcions even copyrightable? Copyright is not a thing done to works; it exists automatically, from the moment a work exists in fixed form. (From this unfortunate fact, comes many of the thorny issues of making works free.) I

Re: Legal issues with haskell-unix-time

2016-05-26 Thread Eloi
El 24/05/16 a les 12:36, Dmitry Bogatov ha escrit: > There is 'cbits/conv.c' in 'haskell-unix-time' source package, which > is probably is of same copyright, as haskell code (BSD-3-clause), > but there is part of it, that is explicitly marked as all-rights-reserved. > No email is provided. This

Re: Legal issues with haskell-unix-time

2016-05-24 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > There is 'cbits/conv.c' in 'haskell-unix-time' source package, which > is probably is of same copyright, as haskell code (BSD-3-clause), > but there is part of it, that is explicitly marked as all-rights-reserved. > No email is provided.

Legal issues with haskell-unix-time

2016-05-24 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
There is 'cbits/conv.c' in 'haskell-unix-time' source package, which is probably is of same copyright, as haskell code (BSD-3-clause), but there is part of it, that is explicitly marked as all-rights-reserved. No email is provided. This troublesome part is only for portability on Solaris, and is