Re: PEAR / PHP License status [QuickForm v3]

2006-12-11 Thread MJ Ray
Sylvain Beucler [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is the status of the discussion with PEAR (or PHP Group) about using the PHP license in some of the PEAR packages? [1][2] [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/08/msg00188.html [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/12/msg00025.html Use of

Re: PEAR / PHP License status [QuickForm v3]

2006-12-11 Thread Sylvain Beucler
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:40:02AM +, MJ Ray wrote: Sylvain Beucler [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is the status of the discussion with PEAR (or PHP Group) about using the PHP license in some of the PEAR packages? [1][2] [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/08/msg00188.html [2]

PEAR / PHP License status

2006-12-08 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi, What is the status of the discussion with PEAR (or PHP Group) about using the PHP license in some of the PEAR packages? [1][2] I'm currently in need of QuickForm (v3) in a GNU GPL'd application, but QuickForm is released under the PHP license, which is incompatible :/ Thanks, [1]

Re: PEAR / PHP License status

2006-12-08 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:05:52PM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote: Hi, What is the status of the discussion with PEAR (or PHP Group) about using the PHP license in some of the PEAR packages? [1][2] I'm currently in need of QuickForm (v3) in a GNU GPL'd application, but QuickForm is released

Re: PEAR / PHP License status

2006-12-08 Thread Andrew Donnellan
On 12/9/06, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:05:52PM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote: Hi, If you are the author of said application, you could release under the MIT or BSD-type license. Couldn't GPL+exception be used? Or is the incompatibility both ways?