Re: IBM Public License 1.0 - ICU

2000-09-21 Thread David Starner
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 01:34:16PM -0700, Yves Arrouye wrote: Also, if that license is OK, should I package it with ICU, or should I try to get it included in base-files? Why would you include it in base-files? It's not exactly a common license. -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http/ftp:

RE: IBM Public License 1.0 - ICU

2000-09-21 Thread Yves Arrouye
Why would you include it in base-files? It's not exactly a common license. I'm just asking :) It's not a common license but the number of licenses that Debian agrees with is not that big either, so it may be a good idea to put them here. That will also help new maintainers know which license

Re: IBM Public License 1.0 - ICU

2000-09-21 Thread David Starner
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 01:41:32PM -0700, Yves Arrouye wrote: I'm just asking :) It's not a common license but the number of licenses that Debian agrees with is not that big either, so it may be a good idea to put them here. Actually, the number of licenses Debian agrees with is pretty large.