On Jan 29, 2004, at 21:31, Branden Robinson wrote:
Adobe is probably busy lobbying to get a certain bill passed which
will rectify that little defect in U.S. copyright law.
If the Court has any shred of basic literacy left in reading the
Constitution, that should go nowhere. Not sure at the
O Xoves, 29 de Xaneiro de 2004 ás 17:06:06 +0900, Kenshi Muto escribía:
Do you have any idea to cope with this situation? Or does anyone come
up with possible proposal so that Adobe can be persuaded? I
appreciate your help.
They claim that integrity of the CMap files is the main issue.
The comparison is made to altering the ascii mapping -- but the ascii
mapping is not copyrightable. It's just a sequence of characters, as
valid as any other and preferred only because of broad adoption.
Are these CMap files actually copyrightable as creative works?
-Brian
--
Brian Sniffen
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:19:56AM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
The comparison is made to altering the ascii mapping -- but the ascii
mapping is not copyrightable. It's just a sequence of characters, as
valid as any other and preferred only because of broad adoption.
Are these CMap
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 07:10:52PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:19:56AM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
The comparison is made to altering the ascii mapping -- but the ascii
mapping is not copyrightable. It's just a sequence of characters, as
valid as any
5 matches
Mail list logo
