On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 08:57:16AM +0100, Jakob Bohm wrote:
Or how about the Meta-DFSG plus GPL (change to OSD if you do not
want the DFSG used in this way, see another thread here...).
This program is free software, you may (the usual GPL boilerplate).
Additionally as an exception to
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
I would like to help Charles Bloom make the Bloom Public License (BPL)
DFSG compliant. It's available at: http://www.cbloom.com/bpl.txt
The version modified May 14, 2002 seems to have problems with it.
Very much so. The license is kind of a mess
Scripsit Drew Scott Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's available at: http://www.cbloom.com/bpl.txt
Hm, first of all, clause 1 seems to severely restrict which software
the author himself is allowed to distribute. If he gives his neighbor
a disk with GCC on it, he will be in trouble with the GPL, or
Drew Scott Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to help Charles Bloom make the Bloom Public License (BPL)
DFSG compliant. It's available at: http://www.cbloom.com/bpl.txt
Looking at the message you quoted, it might be easier to just have him
dual-license under the GPL.
Regards,
Walter
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:26:45AM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
I would like to help Charles Bloom make the Bloom Public License (BPL)
DFSG compliant. It's available at: http://www.cbloom.com/bpl.txt
The version modified May 14, 2002 seems to have problems with it.
[ ... ]
Item 6 seems
]
To: Drew Scott Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help with the Bloom Public License (fwd)
How about if I add this term at the top :
0. The software may be used or distributed according to the terms of
the GPL (GNU Public License) at the distributor's option.
If you do
Charles Bloom (via Drew Scott Daniels) wrote:
How about if I add this term at the top :
0. The software may be used or distributed according to the terms of
the GPL (GNU Public License) at the distributor's option.
If you do not wish to adhere to the terms of the GPL, you
7 matches
Mail list logo
