Re: Mozilla can't be GPL? (was: pkcs#11 license)

2005-10-12 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 04:41:27PM +, MJ Ray wrote: It is interesting. Could one read the API reference documentation and recreate the header files from the ideas? Except for any magic constants (which can be extracted from the documentation), I can recreate a C header from the code that

Re: Mozilla can't be GPL? (was: pkcs#11 license)

2005-10-11 Thread Lewis Jardine
Ludovic Rousseau wrote: It seams the only human possible solution is to ask RSA to change their licence. I guess the Mozilla foundation could help if they care about licencing issues. Any idea of how we should contact Mozilla and RSA? I am really _not_ a diplomatic guy :-) I'd expect Mozilla

Re: Mozilla can't be GPL? (was: pkcs#11 license)

2005-10-11 Thread Gervase Markham
Lewis Jardine wrote: Ludovic Rousseau wrote: It seams the only human possible solution is to ask RSA to change their licence. I guess the Mozilla foundation could help if they care about licencing issues. Any idea of how we should contact Mozilla and RSA? I am really _not_ a diplomatic guy :-)

Re: Mozilla can't be GPL? (was: pkcs#11 license)

2005-10-10 Thread MJ Ray
Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After a bit of research we (Andreas, me and some others) found that all the applications using the PKCS#11 API also use tha RSA header files. These header files are the API reference so it is normal to use them. I thought the API reference was the PDF