MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2004-01-09 03:48:49 + Joel Konkle-Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I guess the meat of my question applies to ndiswrapper
http://ndiswrapper.sf.net as well. ndiswrapper itself is GPL, but
to work
properly, requires the Windows drivers for the
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 07:42:06AM -0500, Walter Landry wrote:
I think it is analogous to Quake. Quake's source is free, but to do
anything useful (or fun) requires the shareware wads. So until
someone actually writes a free driver that ndiswrapper can use, I
would say that it belongs in
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 07:42:06AM -0500, Walter Landry wrote:
I guess the meat of my question applies to ndiswrapper
http://ndiswrapper.sf.net as well. ndiswrapper itself is GPL, but
to work
properly, requires the Windows drivers for the network devices it is
trying
to
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 09:30:59AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
ndiswrapper was created specifically to load windows drivers for network
devices that Linux doesn't support yet, so I think it's doubtful that
someone would write a free driver for it. They could just write a real
Linux driver
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 02:48:06PM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
Someone might write a free driver for Windows, that this wrapper could run.
Yes, someone could. But I doubt someone will. What would be the point?
You're asking what the point of Free Software is? The answer doesn't
care which
On Jan 8, 2004, at 22:48, Joel Konkle-Parker wrote:
I guess the meat of my question applies to ndiswrapper
http://ndiswrapper.sf.net as well. ndiswrapper itself is GPL, but to
work properly, requires the Windows drivers for the network devices it
is trying to configure. Does this somehow
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 05:05:13PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 09:30:59AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
ndiswrapper was created specifically to load windows drivers for network
devices that Linux doesn't support yet, so I think it's doubtful that
someone would write a
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 06:34:07PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 02:48:06PM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
Someone might write a free driver for Windows, that this wrapper could
run.
Yes, someone could. But I doubt someone will. What would be the point?
You're
Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:12:41PM -0600, Joel Konkle-Parker wrote:
Can someone tell me the legal status of Linuxant's driverloader software
as it relates to packaging for Debian? I believe the software itself,
while it needs a license key, is free, although it requires
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:12:41PM -0600, Joel Konkle-Parker wrote:
Can someone tell me the legal status of Linuxant's driverloader software
as it relates to packaging for Debian? I believe the software itself,
while it needs a license key, is free, although it requires non-free
Windows
On 2004-01-09 03:48:49 + Joel Konkle-Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I guess the meat of my question applies to ndiswrapper
http://ndiswrapper.sf.net as well. ndiswrapper itself is GPL, but
to work
properly, requires the Windows drivers for the network devices it is
trying
to
11 matches
Mail list logo
