Hi!
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud schrieb:
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Josselin Mouette schrieb:
Definitely non-free, and the author’s clarification removes any doubt.
Hmmm... Actually... As he didn't gave a definition of good or evil
one could argue, that everything is good... for someone.
We
Yes, it's this topic again. I've just had a short mail exchange with
crockford
himself. His final answer: If you cannot tolerate the license, then do not
use the software.
Then his software will simply be not packaged.
--
bye, Joerg
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/How_to_win_an_argument
Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro writes:
Yes, it's this topic again. I've just had a short mail exchange with
crockford himself.
Thank you for pursuing this matter in good faith and trying to get a
satisfactory resolution.
His final answer: If you cannot tolerate the license, then do not use
the
Le Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:56:44PM -0500, Joe Neal a écrit :
http://wonko.com/post/jsmin-isnt-welcome-on-google-code
Hi Joe,
have you seen the comment of Joey Hess, that it ‘Looks like the jsmin.py in
libv8 is now a reimplementation with a standard license.’
Have a nice week-end,
--
Le vendredi 26 mars 2010 à 18:43 +0100, Thomas Koch a écrit :
Yes, it's this topic again. I've just had a short mail exchange with
crockford
himself. His final answer: If you cannot tolerate the license, then do not
use the software.
Could you please give me a definitive Yes or No for
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Le vendredi 26 mars 2010 à 18:43 +0100, Thomas Koch a écrit :
Yes, it's this topic again. I've just had a short mail exchange
with crockford himself. His final answer: If you cannot tolerate
the license, then do not use the software.
Could you
Hi!
Josselin Mouette schrieb:
Yes, it's this topic again. I've just had a short mail exchange with
crockford
himself. His final answer: If you cannot tolerate the license, then do not
use the software.
Could you please give me a definitive Yes or No for the below license?
[..]
The
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Josselin Mouette schrieb:
Definitely non-free, and the author’s clarification removes any doubt.
Hmmm... Actually... As he didn't gave a definition of good or evil
one could argue, that everything is good... for someone.
However, I would strongly advise to
The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil.
Neither term has any objective meaning and there is no shortage of people with
philosophy phds willing to state such as their expert opinion. Assuming good
and evil are both subjective terms, the license merely states that The
Software shall be
9 matches
Mail list logo
