Bone Baboon writes:
> Sections
> * Rust trademark policy
> * Impact on free software projects
>
> # Rust trademark policy
The conversation about the Rust Trademark policy issue has been
happening on several mailing lists and in different IRC channels. I
decided to writ
dation's licensing team will be taking a serious
look at the Rust trademark policy issue (no time frame was given).
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/directory-discuss/2021-06/msg1.html>
After further reading on the topic and after receiving addition
feedback I have written an update to my understanding of the Rust
trademark issue.
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/directory-discuss/2021-06/msg0.html>
Bone Baboon writes:
> Sections
> * Rust trademark polic
r dispensation for Rust.
A better outcome than getting as Debian specific dispensation would be
for the Rust trademark policy to be modified to resolve this issue or to
rename Rust and Cargo when distributing copies or modified versions.
Getting a Debian specific dispensation for Rust would not a
Bone Baboon writes:
> * The "Uses that require explicit approval" section says "Distributing a
> modified version of the Rust programming language or the Cargo package
> manager and calling it Rust or Cargo requires explicit, written
> permission from the Rust core team.". This appears to
Sections
* Rust trademark policy
* Impact on free software projects
# Rust trademark policy
Is Rust not free software because of the Rust trademark policy?
<https://wiki.hyperbola.info/doku.php?id=en:main:rusts_freedom_flaws>
Information on the four software freedoms is here:
6 matches
Mail list logo
