Re: Status and futur of ArgoUML package(s)

2004-01-21 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Jan 18, 2004, at 12:45, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Thanks for your help. ArgoUML project[1] does put this library in their CVS[2]. Do you think it's legal? I already did warn them[3], Was I wrong or right? There are provisions in there allowing redistribution under certain terms. It's a very

Re: Status and futur of ArgoUML package(s)

2004-01-18 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 21:29, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: I did Cc: debian-legal to have a look at the license but I think it's completly non-free! Not only non-free, but so bad we couldn't even put it in the non-free section. For example, way down

Status and futur of ArgoUML package(s)

2004-01-17 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi all, I'm facing a serious problem with the ArgoUML debian package. The next generation of ArgoUML (current development 0.15 and next stable 0.16) will use the mdr library: http://mdr.netbeans.org/download/daily.html Which is an implementation of the JMI from Sun. As you can see in the web

Re: Status and futur of ArgoUML package(s)

2004-01-17 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 21:29, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: I did Cc: debian-legal to have a look at the license but I think it's completly non-free! Not only non-free, but so bad we couldn't even put it in the non-free section. For example, way down in the third set of terms(!) it has a non-compete