Re: Strange GPL licensing: most recent

2006-12-04 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:14:44 -0800 Josh Triplett wrote: Francesco Poli wrote: [...] Should I ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] to provide an authoritative answer about this situation? I think that in this case, the meaning of the statement depends on the author more than the FSF. However, you might

Strange GPL licensing: most recent

2006-11-25 Thread Francesco Poli
Hi all! According to its debian/copyright[1], bootcd[2] is licensed as follows: | | License: | Most recent version of the GPL. | I've never seen anything like this. I saw GPL v2 or later, GPL v2 only, GPL (which automatically means any version[3]), even GPL v1 or later, but I've never seen GPL

Re: Strange GPL licensing: most recent

2006-11-25 Thread Josh Triplett
Francesco Poli wrote: According to its debian/copyright[1], bootcd[2] is licensed as follows: | | License: | Most recent version of the GPL. | I've never seen anything like this. I saw GPL v2 or later, GPL v2 only, GPL (which automatically means any version[3]), even GPL v1 or later,