On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:14:44 -0800 Josh Triplett wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
Should I ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] to provide an authoritative answer
about this situation?
I think that in this case, the meaning of the statement depends on the
author more than the FSF. However, you might
Hi all!
According to its debian/copyright[1], bootcd[2] is licensed as follows:
|
| License:
| Most recent version of the GPL.
|
I've never seen anything like this.
I saw GPL v2 or later, GPL v2 only, GPL (which automatically means
any version[3]), even GPL v1 or later, but I've never seen GPL
Francesco Poli wrote:
According to its debian/copyright[1], bootcd[2] is licensed as follows:
|
| License:
| Most recent version of the GPL.
|
I've never seen anything like this.
I saw GPL v2 or later, GPL v2 only, GPL (which automatically means
any version[3]), even GPL v1 or later,
3 matches
Mail list logo