Re: Sun clarifies intent of the DLJ

2006-06-07 Thread Steve Langasek
Tom, On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 11:58:44PM -0500, Tom Marble wrote: Thanks to the comments here [1] (and also [2] [3] [4]) we have worked to incorporate your feedback to further clarify the intent of the DLJ. We have made an updated revision to the DLJ FAQ (now version 1.2) which is publicly

Re: Sun clarifies intent of the DLJ

2006-06-07 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:42:01AM -0700, Ken Arromdee wrote: On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Matthew Palmer wrote: Although I'm not sure about the absolute validity of the argument that licences have to be written incomprehensibly, I certainly think that this revised FAQ preamble allows people to rely

Re: Sun clarifies intent of the DLJ

2006-06-07 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:42:01 -0700 (PDT) Ken Arromdee wrote: On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Matthew Palmer wrote: Although I'm not sure about the absolute validity of the argument that licences have to be written incomprehensibly, I certainly think that this revised FAQ preamble allows people to rely

Re: Sun clarifies intent of the DLJ

2006-06-06 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 11:58:44PM -0500, Tom Marble wrote: We have made an updated revision to the DLJ FAQ (now version 1.2) which is publicly available at [5]. The preamble to the FAQ has been specifically re-written to clarify the relationship between the FAQ and the license itself.

Re: Sun clarifies intent of the DLJ

2006-06-06 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 07:58, Tom Marble wrote: All: Hello, thanks for your efforts. Thanks to the comments here [1] (and also [2] [3] [4]) we have worked to incorporate your feedback to further clarify the intent of the DLJ. We have made an updated revision to the DLJ FAQ (now version

Re: Sun clarifies intent of the DLJ

2006-06-06 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 05 juin 2006 à 23:58 -0500, Tom Marble a écrit : We have made an updated revision to the DLJ FAQ (now version 1.2) which is publicly available at [5]. The preamble to the FAQ has been specifically re-written to clarify the relationship between the FAQ and the license itself. Thanks

Sun clarifies intent of the DLJ

2006-06-05 Thread Tom Marble
All: Thanks to the comments here [1] (and also [2] [3] [4]) we have worked to incorporate your feedback to further clarify the intent of the DLJ. We have made an updated revision to the DLJ FAQ (now version 1.2) which is publicly available at [5]. The preamble to the FAQ has been specifically