What about them?
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021, 16:42 Benito Garcia wrote:
>
>
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 08:20:59PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
Can you remember what arguments support the idea that Powered by
SugarCRM is an author attribution?
Especially in cases like this, I think the man on the Clapham omnibus
would probably assume it referred to the running software, rather
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011, at 09:36 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
I'll mention, again, that this forum is not appropriate for general
discussion about licenses in the absence of an actual existing work that
is proposed for (or already in) Debian.
Hi Ben.
I'm working to open source a medical informatics
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011, at 02:28 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
The critical aspect here is whether author attributions are
required to be preserved in the material, or also in the ALNs.
Retaining them in the material is clearly reasonable, but I
don't believe that forcing them to be present in the
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 at 16:47:33 -0500, Clark C. Evans wrote:
the question for me is
if Powered By SugarCRM is a reasonable author attribution.
No, I don't think it is.
Copyright © 2011 John Doe and Copyright © 2011 SugarCRM Inc. are
both Appropriate Legal Notices; Incorporates code by John
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 02:43:33PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 at 16:47:33 -0500, Clark C. Evans wrote:
the question for me is
if Powered By SugarCRM is a reasonable author attribution.
No, I don't think it is.
Copyright © 2011 John Doe and Copyright © 2011
Richard Fontana rfont...@redhat.com
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 08:57:56PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
I don't know of anywhere that Powered by SugarCRM is a legal notice.
Does anyone? What legal effect does it have?
I worked on the drafting of GPLv3 at my previous job (no tomatoes,
please :). You
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:18:41 -0500 Clark C. Evans wrote:
Is there a debian-legal position on Appropriate Legal Notices
aspect of the GPLv3. Including 5(d) and 7(b);
I don't think there's a debian-legal position (whatever that may mean)
on the GNU GPL v3.
My own personal analysis may be found
My recommendation (for basically any software, not just yours!)
is still licensing under either the GPL, LGPL or Expat MIT/X11 license;
of which the GPL sounds like the best fit for what you want.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 at 14:18:41 -0500, Clark C. Evans wrote:
Is there a debian-legal position on
Clark C. Evans c...@clarkevans.com
Is there a debian-legal position on Appropriate Legal Notices
aspect of the GPLv3. Including 5(d) and 7(b); OR, alternatively,
the OSI approved Common Public Attribution License (CPAL).
I'm asking because having appropriate credit really resonates
with
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Clark C. Evans wrote:
* In accordance with Section 7(b) of the GNU Affero General Public
* License version 3, these Appropriate Legal Notices must retain the
* display of the Powered by SugarCRM logo. If the display of the
* logo is not reasonably feasible for technical
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011, at 01:37 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
An interactive user interface displays Appropriate Legal Notices
to the extent that it includes a convenient and prominently
visible feature that (1) displays an appropriate copyright notice,
and (2) tells the user that
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 08:57:56PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
I don't know of anywhere that Powered by SugarCRM is a legal notice.
Does anyone? What legal effect does it have?
I worked on the drafting of GPLv3 at my previous job (no tomatoes,
please :). You may note that section 7 of (A)GPLv3 says
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Clark C. Evans wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011, at 01:37 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
An interactive user interface displays Appropriate Legal Notices
to the extent that it includes a convenient and prominently
visible feature that (1) displays an appropriate
Clark C. Evans c...@clarkevans.com writes:
I'm asking because having appropriate credit really resonates with
with those in my organization who are getting behind releasing our
entire medical informatics system (and modules). So, this could be
done under GPL /w ALN or under the CPAL.
I'll
16 matches
Mail list logo
