Re: TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws

2024-03-02 Thread Florian Weimer
* Walter Landry: > Paul Wise writes: >> On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 20:16 -0500, P. J. McDermott wrote: >>> Ping?  Any thoughts on whether a font DRM modification tool would be >>> legal to distribute and use in Debian given that the DRM is a simple bit >>> field rather than an "effective" TPM such as

Re: TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws

2024-02-05 Thread P. J. McDermott
On 2024-02-05 at 10:34, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, 2024-01-15 at 06:05 -0500, P. J. McDermott wrote: > > > Paul Wise mentioned[8] on the fonts team list in 2021 a couple programs > > ("embed"[9], a derivative "ttembed"[10], and "ttfpatch"[11]) that unset > > the DRM/TPM bits, enabling full use of

Re: TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws

2024-02-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, 2024-01-15 at 06:05 -0500, P. J. McDermott wrote: > Paul Wise mentioned[8] on the fonts team list in 2021 a couple programs > ("embed"[9], a derivative "ttembed"[10], and "ttfpatch"[11]) that unset > the DRM/TPM bits, enabling full use of the fonts.  "embed" was written > by a font

Re: TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws

2024-02-03 Thread P. J. McDermott
On 2024-02-02 at 22:18, Walter Landry wrote: > This feels similar to pdf viewers that do not honor DRM bits like 'do > not print', which Debian distributes. Here is an old email exchange. > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/03/msg00308.html > > and a bug ticket that implemented DRM

Re: TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws

2024-02-02 Thread Walter Landry
Paul Wise writes: > On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 20:16 -0500, P. J. McDermott wrote: >> Ping?  Any thoughts on whether a font DRM modification tool would be >> legal to distribute and use in Debian given that the DRM is a simple bit >> field rather than an "effective" TPM such as scrambling or

Re: TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws

2024-02-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 20:16 -0500, P. J. McDermott wrote: > [Resending to the list, as it apparently didn't go through earlier.] It did go through. > Ping?  Any thoughts on whether a font DRM modification tool would be > legal to distribute and use in Debian given that the DRM is a simple bit >

Re: TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws

2024-02-02 Thread P. J. McDermott
[Resending to the list, as it apparently didn't go through earlier.] Ping? Any thoughts on whether a font DRM modification tool would be legal to distribute and use in Debian given that the DRM is a simple bit field rather than an "effective" TPM such as scrambling or encryption? FontForge of

Re: TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws

2024-02-02 Thread P. J. McDermott
Ping? Any thoughts on whether a font DRM modification tool would be legal to distribute and use in Debian given that the DRM is a simple bit field rather than an "effective" TPM such as scrambling or encryption? FontForge of course can also do this, though it's not "primarily designed or

TrueType/OpenType and anti-circumvention laws

2024-01-15 Thread P. J. McDermott
[I'm Cc:'ing Felix Lechner in case he is interested in this thread. Please Cc: Felix (unless he says otherwise) and me in replies; I've set Reply-To: to automate this.] Hi, I stumbled upon lintian's truetype-font-prohibits-installable-embedding and opentype-font-prohibits-installable-embedding