> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Langasek
> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 3:35 PM
> To: Limonciello, Mario
> Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: UEFI Revocation List being distributed by Debian
>
> Hi Mario,
>
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 02
Hi Mario,
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 02:25:41AM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> Hello,
> Recently there has been a discussion within upstream fwupd to start
> including the UEFI dbx revocation list directly with the fwupd package.
> During the code review for this as part of reviewing th
.
> -Original Message-
> From: Florian Weimer
> Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 1:43 AM
> To: Paul Wise
> Cc: Limonciello, Mario; debian-legal
> Subject: Re: UEFI Revocation List being distributed by Debian
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> * Paul Wise:
>
> >
* Paul Wise:
> On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 07:26 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> It also has to be optional and disabled by default because a future
>> dbx update may be specifically designed to stop Debian systems from
>> booting. No Debian user will want to install such an update.
>
> Isn't the poi
Paul,
Appreciate your response.
On May 7, 2020 00:26, Florian Weimer wrote:
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
* Paul Wise:
> This sort of data is liable to be out of date if included in the
> source code of fwupd, I think this should be separate to fwupd in the
> same way that tzdata is separate to glibc and
On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 07:26 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> It also has to be optional and disabled by default because a future
> dbx update may be specifically designed to stop Debian systems from
> booting. No Debian user will want to install such an update.
Isn't the point of these updates to
* Paul Wise:
> This sort of data is liable to be out of date if included in the
> source code of fwupd, I think this should be separate to fwupd in the
> same way that tzdata is separate to glibc and DNSSEC root keys are
> separate to DNS servers and the web PKI CAs should be separate to web
> bro
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 3:06 AM Mario Limonciello wrote:
> there are concerns if this would fit within the DFSG
>
> https://uefi.org/revocationlistfile
Since it does not include modification permission and several
restrictions on redistribution, this license is unlikely to meet the
DFSG requiremen
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 3:06 AM Mario Limonciello wrote:
> https://uefi.org/revocationlistfile
For the benefit of the mailing list archive, here is a copy of that
page in plain text form:
UEFI Revocation List File
ACCESS TO THE UEFI REVOCATION LIST FILE
This file is used to update the Secure Bo
Hello,
Recently there has been a discussion within upstream fwupd to start including
the UEFI dbx revocation list directly with the fwupd package. During the code
review for this as part of reviewing the terms included with it there are
concerns if this would fit within the DFSG. Would it be
10 matches
Mail list logo
