On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 04:53, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:56:44 -0500,
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:12:49PM -0500, David Turner wrote:
The GPL forbids removing code from interactive programs which displays
copyright notices.
Yes,
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 19:56, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:12:49PM -0500, David Turner wrote:
[RMS doesn't make decisions for Debian...]
As much feedback during the FSF's public comment
period on GNU FDL 1.2 revealed, there are many people who disagree with
his
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:56:44 -0500,
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:12:49PM -0500, David Turner wrote:
The GPL forbids removing code from interactive programs which displays
copyright notices.
Yes, and in my opinion this is a defect in the license.
You
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 06:53:28PM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
The GPL forbids removing code from interactive programs which displays
copyright notices.
Yes, and in my opinion this is a defect in the license.
You mean this?
| If the program is interactive, make it output a short notice
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 19:56, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:12:49PM -0500, David Turner wrote:
Unfortunately, DFSG doesn't discuss what sorts of modifications can be
restricted.
Implicitly, no sort of restriction on modification is permitted, except
those already
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:12:49PM -0500, David Turner wrote:
Unfortunately, DFSG doesn't discuss what sorts of modifications can be
restricted.
Implicitly, no sort of restriction on modification is permitted, except
those already mandated by copyright law (removing someone's copyright
notices
6 matches
Mail list logo
