Bernd Warken wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 06:54:12PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 11:59:47PM +0100, Bernd Warken wrote:
Some time ago, there was a discussion to make documents under the GNU
Free Documentation License (FDL) unfree for Debian.
Some time ago,
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 06:54:12PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 11:59:47PM +0100, Bernd Warken wrote:
Some time ago, there was a discussion to make documents under the GNU
Free Documentation License (FDL) unfree for Debian.
Some time ago, there was an actual
-Original Message-
From: Bernd Warken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So there should be a note in the Debian wekkly news to make things
clear.
That's what most people read.
There was a link.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:45:59PM +, Sunnanvind wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bernd Warken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So there should be a note in the Debian wekkly news to make things
clear.
That's what most people read.
There was a link.
Yes, but unfortunately, the links
Some time ago, there was a discussion to make documents under the GNU
Free Documentation License (FDL) unfree for Debian. This is not
necessary.
The FDL seems to have a bug and some flaws. The bug that arbitrary
sections can be shut off from modification is only a potential danger
for misuse.
Bernd Warken [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some time ago, there was a discussion to make documents under the GNU
Free Documentation License (FDL) unfree for Debian. This is not
necessary.
...
Therefore, it would be enough to put a freeze to not use the FDL for
future documents, but leave the
Again... this whole issue seems like it originated with me
misunderstanding Branden.
I somehow (don't ask me how) got under the impression that he thought
that the Debian shall remain 100% free software-part of the social
contract meant that every part of every piece of software should
Sunnanvind Fenderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(Oh, and by the way, RMS kept ignoring me. That's really creepy, am I
in his killfile or something?)
Did he get your messages? He doesn't subscribe to debian-legal, so if
you over-zealously trimmed him from your messages, of course he
wouldn't
On Monday, November 26, 2001, at 02:18 AM, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Did he get your messages? He doesn't subscribe to debian-legal, so if
you over-zealously trimmed him from your messages, of course he
wouldn't get them.
I'm sure he got at least one (he has that auto-response thing going
9 matches
Mail list logo
