Re: gnome-mastermind trademark question

2008-12-02 Thread Filippo Argiolas
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/12/2 Hans de Goede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Ok, well in that case I'll pass I'm already bothering legal way too often >> with games related questions. > > It would be better to have a name upstream likes, but if the name

Re: gnome-mastermind trademark question

2008-12-02 Thread Miriam Ruiz
2008/12/2 Filippo Argiolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Miriam, probably you should forward them my last reply too. Yup, sorry, I wrote my email before yours. > As I said I'm open to a name change or a suggestion. > The game it's been in Debian for more than one year now and no one > ever complain

Re: gnome-mastermind trademark question

2008-12-02 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:20, Filippo Argiolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I could have continued to ignore it but *I* choosed to resume this > issue because I'm a bit worried about it, so, please stop talking > about unilateral changes or things like that. Again, there has been a misunderstandi

Re: gnome-mastermind trademark question

2008-12-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:49:34AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > It would be better to have a name upstream likes, but if the name is > not legally safe for Fedora, it won't be for Debian either and > ignoring the problem won't fix it. >From the limited context you've provided, there's nothing to in

Re: gnome-mastermind trademark question

2008-12-02 Thread Miriam Ruiz
2008/12/2 Hans de Goede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ok, well in that case I'll pass I'm already bothering legal way too often > with games related questions. It would be better to have a name upstream likes, but if the name is not legally safe for Fedora, it won't be for Debian either and ignoring the