On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 12:42:16PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
This program is released under the GPL with the additional exemption that
compiling, linking, and/or using OpenSSL is allowed.
Would this be sufficient for Debian?
The above doesn't actually add anything to the
Hi,
One of the packages I maintain is monit[0], they now have a long awaited
feature using SSL. I have read that GPL and OpenSSL is not compatible and have
been mailing with the developers of monit. They asked if was okay for Debian
to add add this to the license:
This program is released
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 01:46:18PM +0200, Fredrik Steen wrote:
Hi,
One of the packages I maintain is monit[0], they now have a long awaited
feature using SSL. I have read that GPL and OpenSSL is not compatible and have
You are correct. OpenSSL has an advertising clause which is incompatible
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 01:46:18PM +0200, Fredrik Steen wrote:
One of the packages I maintain is monit[0], they now have a long awaited
feature using SSL. I have read that GPL and OpenSSL is not compatible and have
been mailing with the developers of monit. They asked if was okay for Debian
to
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 03:23:44PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
been mailing with the developers of monit. They asked if was okay for
Debian
to add add this to the license:
This program is released under the GPL with the additional exemption that
compiling, linking, and/or using
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 12:42:16PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
The above doesn't actually add anything to the rights already granted by
the GPL. The specific permission that's missing is *redistribution* of
binaries linked against OpenSSL, so that's what their exemption needs to
say.
Ah,
6 matches
Mail list logo
