El domingo, 12 de marzo de 2006 a las 13:39:45 -0500, Mike O'Connor escribía:
The only things the documentation license holds as invariant are the GPL
and the GFDL themselves, and Debian already accepts those as being
invariant, this documentation should no longer be considered non-free in
Mike O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#ModifyGPL ].
That URL says that you can modify the GPL to create your own license,
then release your software under that license, just don't call it GPL
anymore. It doesn't say, you can take some work that
* Mike O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060312 19:40]:
The only things the documentation license holds as invariant are the GPL
and the GFDL themselves, and Debian already accepts those as being
invariant, this documentation should no longer be considered non-free in
light of GR-2006-01. But
from the documentation in question:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with the
Invariant Sections being ``GNU General Public
Mike O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
from the documentation in question:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with the
Mike O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only things the documentation license holds as invariant are the GPL
and the GFDL themselves, and Debian already accepts those as being
invariant, this documentation should no longer be considered non-free in
light of GR-2006-01. But becuase of this, I'm
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 20:13 +, MJ Ray wrote:
Mike O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finally, the GPL is not invariant: IIRC, you can edit it if you delete
the preamble [see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#ModifyGPL ].
Debian contains the version we received, though. On debian systems,
7 matches
Mail list logo
