Hi,
could anyone comment the attached license? Is it suitable for non-free,
or even contrib?
-- UNACE-SOURCE v1.2b (extract-util) --
the source may be distributed and used,
but I,Marcel Lemke, retain ownership of
the copyrights to the source.
---
WWW:
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-- UNACE-SOURCE v1.2b (extract-util) --
the source may be distributed and used,
but I,Marcel Lemke, retain ownership of
the copyrights to the source.
---
We can distribute it, so non-free should be ok. We can't
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 10:32:48AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Hi,
Hi Eduard,
could anyone comment the attached license? Is it suitable for non-free,
or even contrib?
-- UNACE-SOURCE v1.2b (extract-util) --
the source may be distributed and used,
but I,Marcel Lemke, retain
On 09-Jun-01, 03:32 (CDT), Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
could anyone comment the attached license? Is it suitable for non-free,
or even contrib?
-- UNACE-SOURCE v1.2b (extract-util) --
the source may be distributed and used,
but I,Marcel Lemke, retain ownership of
the
Steve == Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
---
Steve Is that the entirety of the license? If so, it can't even
Steve go into non-free, because it doesn't allow binary
You could presumably do the qmail style source package.
It looks like you're dealing with a source-only package in non-free like
qmail or pine, unless you have an explicit blessing from the author that
he meant distribute in binary form as a use. Contrib's out, though,
since contrib needs to be DFSG free and dependent on something not in
Debian
6 matches
Mail list logo