Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:25:06AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:00:47AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:30:52AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > I can only find it currently in 2 packages in Debian--prozilla and elinks. > > > The others that us

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 10:07:07AM +, MJ Ray wrote: > Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] I can only find it currently in 2 packages in > > Debian--prozilla and elinks. The others that used it in the past > > (libcurl, wget?) likely rewrote the code since it was obsolete anyway.

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:25:06AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:00:47AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:30:52AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > I can only find it currently in 2 packages in Debian--prozilla and elinks. > > > The others that us

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 10:07:07AM +, MJ Ray wrote: > Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] I can only find it currently in 2 packages in > > Debian--prozilla and elinks. The others that used it in the past > > (libcurl, wget?) likely rewrote the code since it was obsolete anyway.

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:18:14AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:13:50PM +, Henning Makholm wrote: > > Yes, if this is indeed a licence term. As quoted here it could also be > > a non-legal notice that the author considers commercial use without > > notification to be

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Package: prozilla > Version: 1:1.3.6-11 > Severity: normal > ftpparse.c heading: > Commercial use is fine, if you let me know what programs > you're using this in. > Which I believes fails the desert-island test? Legal, can you > confirm?

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:13:50PM +, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Package: prozilla > > Version: 1:1.3.6-11 > > Severity: normal > > > ftpparse.c heading: > > Commercial use is fine, if you let me know what programs > > you're using this i

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:18:14AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:13:50PM +, Henning Makholm wrote: > > Yes, if this is indeed a licence term. As quoted here it could also be > > a non-legal notice that the author considers commercial use without > > notification to be

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Package: prozilla > Version: 1:1.3.6-11 > Severity: normal > ftpparse.c heading: > Commercial use is fine, if you let me know what programs > you're using this in. > Which I believes fails the desert-island test? Legal, can you > confirm?

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:13:50PM +, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Package: prozilla > > Version: 1:1.3.6-11 > > Severity: normal > > > ftpparse.c heading: > > Commercial use is fine, if you let me know what programs > > you're using this i

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:00:47AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:30:52AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > I can only find it currently in 2 packages in Debian--prozilla and elinks. > > The others that used it in the past (libcurl, wget?) likely rewrote the > > code since i

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread MJ Ray
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:54:29AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:46:51AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > Bullshit. There's no requirement whatsoever that a source file may be > > > used at all "commercially", assuming the com

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:06:29AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 08:39:30PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:30:52AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > Wrong? Well http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Commercial-HOWTO.html uses the > > > term to mean exactly th

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 08:39:30PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:30:52AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > Wrong? Well http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Commercial-HOWTO.html uses the > > term to mean exactly that. > > I can't see (from a quick sampling of the items in there) tha

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:30:52AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:54:29AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:46:51AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:16:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > >

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread David Schleef
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:16:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > severity 290242 serious > retitle 290242 Prozilla is non-free: requires notification for commercial use > thanks > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > Package: prozilla > > Version: 1:1.3.6-11 > > Severity: normal > > > > ftpparse.c heading:

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:30:52AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:54:29AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:46:51AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:16:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > >

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:54:29AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:46:51AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:16:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > > ftpparse.c heading: > > > > > > > > Commercial use is fine,

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Josh Triplett
Brian Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:16:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: >>Justin Pryzby wrote: >>>ftpparse.c heading: >>> >>> Commercial use is fine, if you let me know what programs >>> you're using this in. >>> >>>Which I believes fails the desert-island test? Legal, can you

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:46:51AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:16:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > ftpparse.c heading: > > > > > > Commercial use is fine, if you let me know what programs > > > you're using this in. > > > > > > Which

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 06:37:55PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 11:03:19PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > Please use X-Debbugs-CC to Cc bug reports. See > > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting. > > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:44:13AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > >

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:16:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > ftpparse.c heading: > > > > Commercial use is fine, if you let me know what programs > > you're using this in. > > > > Which I believes fails the desert-island test? Legal, can you > > confirm? > >

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Josh Triplett
severity 290242 serious retitle 290242 Prozilla is non-free: requires notification for commercial use thanks Justin Pryzby wrote: > Package: prozilla > Version: 1:1.3.6-11 > Severity: normal > > ftpparse.c heading: > > Commercial use is fine, if you let me know what programs > you're

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:00:47AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:30:52AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > I can only find it currently in 2 packages in Debian--prozilla and elinks. > > The others that used it in the past (libcurl, wget?) likely rewrote the > > code since i

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread MJ Ray
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:54:29AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:46:51AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > Bullshit. There's no requirement whatsoever that a source file may be > > > used at all "commercially", assuming the com

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:06:29AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 08:39:30PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:30:52AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > Wrong? Well http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Commercial-HOWTO.html uses the > > > term to mean exactly th

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 08:39:30PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:30:52AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > Wrong? Well http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Commercial-HOWTO.html uses the > > term to mean exactly that. > > I can't see (from a quick sampling of the items in there) tha

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:30:52AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:54:29AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:46:51AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:16:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > >

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread David Schleef
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:16:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > severity 290242 serious > retitle 290242 Prozilla is non-free: requires notification for commercial use > thanks > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > Package: prozilla > > Version: 1:1.3.6-11 > > Severity: normal > > > > ftpparse.c heading:

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:30:52AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:54:29AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:46:51AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:16:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > >

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 11:03:19PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > Please use X-Debbugs-CC to Cc bug reports. See > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting. > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:44:13AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > ftpparse.c heading: > > > > Commercial use is fine, if you let me know

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:54:29AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:46:51AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:16:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > > ftpparse.c heading: > > > > > > > > Commercial use is fine,

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Brian Nelson
Please use X-Debbugs-CC to Cc bug reports. See http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting. On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:44:13AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > ftpparse.c heading: > > Commercial use is fine, if you let me know what programs > you're using this in. > > Which I believes fails t

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Josh Triplett
Brian Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:16:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: >>Justin Pryzby wrote: >>>ftpparse.c heading: >>> >>> Commercial use is fine, if you let me know what programs >>> you're using this in. >>> >>>Which I believes fails the desert-island test? Legal, can you

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:46:51AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:16:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > ftpparse.c heading: > > > > > > Commercial use is fine, if you let me know what programs > > > you're using this in. > > > > > > Which

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 06:37:55PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 11:03:19PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > Please use X-Debbugs-CC to Cc bug reports. See > > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting. > > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:44:13AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > >

prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Justin Pryzby
Package: prozilla Version: 1:1.3.6-11 Severity: normal ftpparse.c heading: Commercial use is fine, if you let me know what programs you're using this in. Which I believes fails the desert-island test? Legal, can you confirm?

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:16:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > ftpparse.c heading: > > > > Commercial use is fine, if you let me know what programs > > you're using this in. > > > > Which I believes fails the desert-island test? Legal, can you > > confirm? > >

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-13 Thread Josh Triplett
severity 290242 serious retitle 290242 Prozilla is non-free: requires notification for commercial use thanks Justin Pryzby wrote: > Package: prozilla > Version: 1:1.3.6-11 > Severity: normal > > ftpparse.c heading: > > Commercial use is fine, if you let me know what programs > you're

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-12 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 11:03:19PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > Please use X-Debbugs-CC to Cc bug reports. See > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting. > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:44:13AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > ftpparse.c heading: > > > > Commercial use is fine, if you let me know

Re: prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-12 Thread Brian Nelson
Please use X-Debbugs-CC to Cc bug reports. See http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting. On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:44:13AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > ftpparse.c heading: > > Commercial use is fine, if you let me know what programs > you're using this in. > > Which I believes fails t

prozilla: Nonfree

2005-01-12 Thread Justin Pryzby
Package: prozilla Version: 1:1.3.6-11 Severity: normal ftpparse.c heading: Commercial use is fine, if you let me know what programs you're using this in. Which I believes fails the desert-island test? Legal, can you confirm? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with