Re: "re" module and old Python 1.6 (GPL incompatible) license?

2009-07-14 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Florian Weimer [090712 20:43]: > * Anderson Lizardo: > > > I noticed that some files of the "re" module still have the (GPL > > incompatible) 1.6 license notice. Is that on purpose or > > unintentionally forgotten? > > It is generally assumed that the PSF license grant in the LICENSE file > ov

Re: "re" module and old Python 1.6 (GPL incompatible) license?

2009-07-12 Thread Florian Weimer
* Anderson Lizardo: > I noticed that some files of the "re" module still have the (GPL > incompatible) 1.6 license notice. Is that on purpose or > unintentionally forgotten? It is generally assumed that the PSF license grant in the LICENSE file overrides all the other licenses that apply to indiv

"re" module and old Python 1.6 (GPL incompatible) license?

2009-07-07 Thread Anderson Lizardo
Hi, I already sent this to the python-dev mailing list last week[1], but there was not much interest on the issue. Here is the original message: ### I noticed that some files of the "re" module still have the (GPL incompatible) 1.6 license notice. Is that on purpose or unintentionally forgotten?