* Florian Weimer [090712 20:43]:
> * Anderson Lizardo:
>
> > I noticed that some files of the "re" module still have the (GPL
> > incompatible) 1.6 license notice. Is that on purpose or
> > unintentionally forgotten?
>
> It is generally assumed that the PSF license grant in the LICENSE file
> ov
* Anderson Lizardo:
> I noticed that some files of the "re" module still have the (GPL
> incompatible) 1.6 license notice. Is that on purpose or
> unintentionally forgotten?
It is generally assumed that the PSF license grant in the LICENSE file
overrides all the other licenses that apply to indiv
Hi,
I already sent this to the python-dev mailing list last week[1], but
there was not much interest on the issue. Here is the original
message:
###
I noticed that some files of the "re" module still have the (GPL
incompatible) 1.6 license notice. Is that on purpose or
unintentionally forgotten?
3 matches
Mail list logo