On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 02:33:02AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Since this hasn't really worked out I propose to delete this stuff again
until someone comes up with a better idea how to better present the
work of debian-legal.
I support deleting the summaries. I think
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 11:12:40AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
search would be a pain. The issues don't divide neatly to me.
Yes, it's not for the most part a question of the manner and style of
the discussion rather than the topic itself.
There's some personal development required by some readers
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10301 March 1977, MJ Ray wrote:
Joerg, if you want to make your life easier, try opening bugs
about any NEW licence questions and cc -legal,
Bugs? Where? Package: general? Or does -legal now have an on bts entry?
Stuff in NEW usually doesnt have a
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 08:10:06PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
I have recently been wondering if it would be possible to come up with
some way of splitting -legal up in order to make it more approachable
for outsiders. Unfortunately it seems that -legal is prone to enormous
threads that often
On 5/27/05, Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe a debian-legal-announce list that only accept signed email from DD ...
... or maybe from people with some legal credentials somewhere? :-)
(I would not be eligible by either criterion. Which might be a good
thing.)
Cheers,
- Michael
On 10298 March 1977, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
As some of you might know some time ago I created a web page for
listing information about licenses discussed by debian-legal
at http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/
Since this hasn't really worked out I propose to delete this stuff again
until
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would love that page working (ie new license summaries added). Would, for=
some
obscure license crap make my life easier if such a thing appears in
NEW. :)
But then it should be maintained, and I know that its impossible to get
something useful out
On Tue, 24 May 2005 02:33:02 +0100 MJ Ray wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Shortly after creation this stalled however as nobody created
summaries anymore, probably because for many discussions it proved
to be difficult if not imopossible to summarise many of the
discussions without
On Mon, 23 May 2005 19:20:42 -0400 Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Frank Lichtenfeld wrote:
Since this hasn't really worked out I propose to delete this stuff
again until someone comes up with a better idea how to better present
the work of debian-legal.
It would really, really, really help if
Francesco Poli wrote:
I hope that we can find a better way to keep track of past debian-legal
discussions: otherwise we are at risk of forgetting the issues that were
discovered and/or deciding in inconsistent ways about similar clauses...
I've noted before that it sounds to me more like a
Hi.
As some of you might know some time ago I created a web page for
listing information about licenses discussed by debian-legal
at http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/
Shortly after creation this stalled however as nobody created
summaries anymore, probably because for many discussions it
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 03:47:05PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
As some of you might know some time ago I created a web page for
listing information about licenses discussed by debian-legal
at http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/
Comments, objections?
Maybe it is sufficient to refer to
In linux.debian.legal Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since this hasn't really worked out I propose to delete this stuff again
until someone comes up with a better idea how to better present the
work of debian-legal.
Seconded.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Frank Lichtenfeld wrote:
Since this hasn't really worked out I propose to delete this stuff again
until someone comes up with a better idea how to better present the
work of debian-legal.
It would really, really, really help if things like the currently-unofficial
debian-legal FAQ, some of the
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Shortly after creation this stalled however as nobody created
summaries anymore, probably because for many discussions it proved
to be difficult if not imopossible to summarise many of the discussions
without either reproducing the entire discussion or to have an
15 matches
Mail list logo
