MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2004-01-09 03:48:49 + Joel Konkle-Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I guess the meat of my question applies to ndiswrapper
http://ndiswrapper.sf.net as well. ndiswrapper itself is GPL, but
to work
properly, requires the Windows drivers for the
Hi guys,
Bug#211765, xfree86: material under non-free licenses in XFree86
appears to have been languishing for a few months now, without anyone
trying to talk to the copyright holders to see if this stuff can be
relicensed in a DFSG-free fashion.
Is there someone on this list who's interested in
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 07:42:06AM -0500, Walter Landry wrote:
I think it is analogous to Quake. Quake's source is free, but to do
anything useful (or fun) requires the shareware wads. So until
someone actually writes a free driver that ndiswrapper can use, I
would say that it belongs in
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 07:42:06AM -0500, Walter Landry wrote:
I guess the meat of my question applies to ndiswrapper
http://ndiswrapper.sf.net as well. ndiswrapper itself is GPL, but
to work
properly, requires the Windows drivers for the network devices it is
trying
to
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 03:25:25PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:19:00PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Hi guys,
Bug#211765, xfree86: material under non-free licenses in XFree86
appears to have been languishing for a few months now, without anyone
trying to talk
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 09:30:59AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
ndiswrapper was created specifically to load windows drivers for network
devices that Linux doesn't support yet, so I think it's doubtful that
someone would write a free driver for it. They could just write a real
Linux driver
(Please CC me on replies, even though I am subscribed to -legal, and
also retain the CC to -events-na.)
Hi -legal,
I am going to make a large (maybe 48-by-48) ink-on-vinyl Debian swirl
banner to bring to the Debian booth at LinuxWorld NY later this
month[1]. I was planning to simply put a Debian
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 02:48:06PM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
Someone might write a free driver for Windows, that this wrapper could run.
Yes, someone could. But I doubt someone will. What would be the point?
You're asking what the point of Free Software is? The answer doesn't
care which
On Jan 8, 2004, at 22:48, Joel Konkle-Parker wrote:
I guess the meat of my question applies to ndiswrapper
http://ndiswrapper.sf.net as well. ndiswrapper itself is GPL, but to
work properly, requires the Windows drivers for the network devices it
is trying to configure. Does this somehow
Hi,
thanks Matt, for polishing my first draft of the letter[1]. I
incorporated your changes, made the wording University of Leeds more
consistent and changed Debian GNU/Linux back to Debian (IMO the
project name is Debian, while Debian GNU/Linux is a product).
I will submit the attached version
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 03:36:12PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
(Please CC me on replies, even though I am subscribed to -legal, and
also retain the CC to -events-na.)
(What CC? :)
I am going to make a large (maybe 48-by-48) ink-on-vinyl Debian swirl
banner to bring to the Debian booth at
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 05:05:13PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 09:30:59AM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
ndiswrapper was created specifically to load windows drivers for network
devices that Linux doesn't support yet, so I think it's doubtful that
someone would write a
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:19:00PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Hi guys,
Bug#211765, xfree86: material under non-free licenses in XFree86
appears to have been languishing for a few months now, without anyone
trying to talk to the copyright holders to see if this stuff can be
relicensed in a
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 06:34:07PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 02:48:06PM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
Someone might write a free driver for Windows, that this wrapper could
run.
Yes, someone could. But I doubt someone will. What would be the point?
You're
14 matches
Mail list logo
