* Francesco Poli:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:17:24 -0700 Joel Aelwyn wrote:
But in my experience, when
contacting authors, a great many of them simply copied boilerplate
from an old BSD license, and if you discuss with them the rationale
given by the University of California when they
* Joel Aelwyn:
4) The DFSG tradition is muddy (at best) on whether it refers to the
4-clause or 3-clause variant of the license -
It's pretty clear: The DFSG are older than the wide-spread adoption of
the 3-clause BSD license. Until UC Berkeley relicensed the Berkeley
Software Distribution
Harald Geyer wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:20:42PM +0100, Harald Geyer wrote:
"Copyright 2005 by XYZ. The copyright holder hereby grants permission to
everyone, forever, to do anything with this work which would otherwise be
restricted by his exclusive
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:44:32PM +0100, Harald Geyer wrote:
I don't see anything in our message that is not specific to my
original wording. Probably you can give me a pointer, why this
enhanced version is still poor.
Especially I don't see why a liberal and short license is a disfavor
to
Harald Geyer wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:20:42PM +0100, Harald Geyer wrote:
"Copyright 2005 by XYZ. The copyright holder hereby grants permission to
everyone, forever, to do anything with this work which would otherwise be
restricted by his exclusive
5 matches
Mail list logo
