El Domingo 24 Abril 2005 16:58, Evan Prodromou escribió:
On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 13:40 +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
Of course I guess the remaining issues are DRM and transparent and opaque
copies. While I find these features of the license really inconvenient
and I wouldn't use
On 4/22/05, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Legally, I can't modify a glibc API and then paste my revisions into
the glibc documentation, because my changes truly are a work derived
from GPL material and can't be amalgamated with GFDL material. I
You are
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 05:39:19PM -0700, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
As I see it, the individuals who assigned their copyright in GNU
documentation to the FSF probably didn't expect to see the relicensing
of their work under a GPL-incompatible license, creating yet another
gated community
3 matches
Mail list logo
