Fathi Boudra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upstream author find a solution :
The next version of KScope, due shortly, uses 'dot' from the command-line=20
instead of dynamically linking with graphviz. This should solve all licensi=
ng problems.
That seems a good solution. Thanks for working on this
Hi,
I want to package a certain software for Debian and need help. The
software itself is under the GPL (v2), but it brings several external
programs and libraries, some of which don't have a license info or one
I'm not sure about.
The list of these externallibs is:
|-- externallibs
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 09:37:34AM +0200, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 08:40:55PM -0800, Josh Triplett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
According to Gervase Markham, the mozilla relicensing process has now
completed; all source files now fall under the GPL, LGPL, and
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:00:51 +0200 Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Hi, I'm packaging a PHP C extension, that was licensed under the LGPL,
but is now under the PHP license.
it was unofficial, but is now listed on PECL[1] and the lead
developper has an @php.net address, and is member of the PHP
Le Mer 12 Avril 2006 22:13, Francesco Poli a écrit :
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:00:51 +0200 Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I've read the thread about PHP license 3.01 in february, and had
the impression that the consensus was that that license is
acceptable for things that come from the PHP Group. is
As you may have read in the thread you're referring to (I don't know
which of them, as there are quite several), I don't agree.
I believe that PHP license version 3.01 does not comply
with the DFSG, even when applied to PHP itself or to PHP Group software.
The problematic clause is #4.
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:45:00 +0200 Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Mer 12 Avril 2006 22:13, Francesco Poli a écrit :
[...]
As you may have read in the thread you're referring to (I don't know
which of them, as there are quite several), I don't agree.
I believe that PHP license version 3.01 does
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:35:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
| |-- DCOracle2-cvs.tar.gz- +(ask)
| |-- TwistedSNMP-0.3.13.tar.gz - +(ask)
| `-- sybase-0.36.tar.gz - +(ask)
The
Hi Matt ( list),
Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:35:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
| |-- DCOracle2-cvs.tar.gz- +(ask)
| |-- TwistedSNMP-0.3.13.tar.gz - +(ask)
| `-- sybase-0.36.tar.gz
Scripsit Wolfgang Lonien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please CC me when answering; I'm not subscribed to Debian-legal.
What was your question? The three licenses you quote are all ordinary
3-clause BSD licenses, which are nice and free.
--
Henning Makholm The man who catches a
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 06:12:59AM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
The TwistedSNMP-0.3.13/license.txt reads:
THIS SOFTWARE IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND SHOULD NOT BE USED IN ANY
SITUATION ENDANGERING HUMAN LIFE OR PROPERTY.
This is possibly problematic, depending on how you define should. I'd
Hi Matt list,
Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 06:12:59AM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
The TwistedSNMP-0.3.13/license.txt reads:
THIS SOFTWARE IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND SHOULD NOT BE USED IN ANY
SITUATION ENDANGERING HUMAN LIFE OR PROPERTY.
This is possibly problematic,
12 matches
Mail list logo
