2008/1/13, Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
i just found the following 'ADDITIONAL TERMS per GNU GPL Section 7' at
http://www.donhopkins.com/home/micropolis/ for the former game SimCity
(now Micropolis). I would like to discuss it's DFSG freeness here:
Martin: Are you planning to
On Jan 14, 2008 2:56 PM, Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Openstreetmap (OSM) project (http://openstreetmap.org/) currently
licenses all data under the CC-by-sa 2.0 license. IIRC, some/most of the CC
licenses had some problems wrt DFSG-freeness
My understanding is that CC-by-sa 2.0 is
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:27:57 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
The plain text version of the licence may be found at
http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/License.txt
and is pasted below in its entirety.
My comments follow.
As usual I would like to draw your attention on my disclaimers, that is
to
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:24:20 + John Halton wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 2:56 PM, Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Openstreetmap (OSM) project (http://openstreetmap.org/) currently
licenses all data under the CC-by-sa 2.0 license. IIRC, some/most of the CC
licenses had some problems
Hello There,
I recently adopted and packaged the font ttf-breip which is already
on the debian repositories on the main section.
My sponsor was in doubt about the licence of the font (SIL), and
double-checked if its dsfg-free or not with other DD's and some of
them told her it was free and some
On Jan 15, 2008 1:17 PM, Mauro Lizaur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So should the ttf-breip font keep in main or should be moved to non-free?
Sorry for my bad english, i hope you understand what i am asking here
Gentium[1] and other SIL OFL licenced fonts have been accepted into
Debian main, so
6 matches
Mail list logo
