OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du dimanche 24 avril 2011, vers 00:07, Ken
Arromdee arrom...@rahul.net disait :
The lawyer wants the poster to pay 700 Euro and stop uploading of Debian.
-
My opion is that this behavior is not good for Debian's reputation
and the project
On 04/24/2011 12:07 AM, Ken Arromdee wrote:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011, Stefan Hirschmann wrote:
The lawyer wants the poster to pay 700 Euro and stop uploading of Debian.
-
My opion is that this behavior is not good for Debian's reputation and
the project should take legal
Stefan Hirschmann wrote:
Short English summary:
-
A lawyer from Augsburg, Germany sent a Abmahnung [2] to a person which
downloaded Debian using Bittorrent.
The company Media Art Holland b.v claimed that she has the Nutzungs
und Verwertungsrechte (something like
MJ Ray m...@phonecoop.coop schrieb:
Stefan Hirschmann wrote:
Short English summary:
-
A lawyer from Augsburg, Germany sent a Abmahnung [2] to a person which
downloaded Debian using Bittorrent.
The company Media Art Holland b.v claimed that she has the Nutzungs
Op 24/04/2011 14:02, Stefano Zacchiroli schreef:
I think the
first step to do is to get hold of the original cease and desist
mail. Has anyone managed to have it yet?
This story sounds too absurd to be true.
I've googled for the keywords Media Art Holland and I can't find the
web site of that
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Vincent Bernat wrote:
The
problem is that on Bittorrent, everyone who downloads also uploads. This
makes it illegal to download just a binary, since if you do that you're also
uploading just a binary, and uploading just a binary is a form of distribution
the GPL doesn't
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Michael Wild wrote:
The
problem is that on Bittorrent, everyone who downloads also uploads. This
makes it illegal to download just a binary, since if you do that you're
also uploading just a binary, and uploading just a binary is a form of
distribution the GPL doesn't
Joerg Schilling or LaForge too may be good sources of information.
-- Sriram
On 4/24/11, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 11:11:58AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
I agree. I'm cc'ing the DPL to see if the project can ask SPI-inc.org
lawyers for assistance. Do we
Ken Arromdee arrom...@rahul.net writes:
It's my understanding that in Germany lawyers can do this to copyright
violators even though they are not the copyright holder.
This is not true. Under German competition law, someone can hire a
lawyer to send a cease-and-desist letter to a competitor if
Hi everyone,
the request to stop redistributing Debian in Germany sparked an
interesting conversation in identi.ca:
http://identi.ca/conversation/69498913
In that conversation Bradley Kuhn said:
bkuhn @vinzv, Please note: *technically speaking*, !Debian
project itself violates
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:57:22PM +0530, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
Joerg Schilling
You must be joking. We're looking for legal expertise, not reality
distortion fields.
or LaForge too may be good sources of information.
Who?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
Marcelo E. Magallon mmaga...@debian.org wrote:
Now, back to the Debian case, Bradley seems to think that
providing a method to download the source (e.g. apt-get source)
is not enough. If I understand it correctly, he's saying we
must do something extra to comply with GPLv2§3: a) provide
Marcelo E. Magallon mmaga...@debian.org writes:
My interpretation of the whole thing is that in order to comply with
the terms of the GPLv2, we should put yet another file, README.GPLv2,
in the .iso explaining how to obtain the sources and accompany that
with the offer to provide source
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:57:22PM +0530, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
or LaForge too may be good sources of information.
Who?
Harald Welte, founder of gpl-violations.org:
http://gpl-violations.org/about.html#whois
--
bye,
14 matches
Mail list logo
